{"id":4565,"date":"2017-08-17T18:16:31","date_gmt":"2017-08-17T12:16:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ctrmcenter.com\/?p=15740"},"modified":"2017-08-17T18:16:31","modified_gmt":"2017-08-17T12:16:31","slug":"dislocations-and-adaptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/","title":{"rendered":"Dislocations and Adaptions"},"content":{"rendered":"

In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM<\/a> software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM<\/a>. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management<\/a>, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build<\/a> is more often a solution than one might imagine
\nContinue reading Dislocations and Adaptions<\/a>. This article appeared first on CTRM Center<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine<\/a>
\nContinue reading Dislocations and Adaptions<\/a>. This article appeared first on CTRM Center<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[805,26,713,238],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Commodity Technology Advisory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommodityTechnologyAdvisory\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gary Vasey\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@comtechadvisory\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@comtechadvisory\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gary Vasey\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Gary Vasey\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7bbe28e59e09a076a043cc6838fcedb4\"},\"headline\":\"Dislocations and Adaptions\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\"},\"wordCount\":212,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"build\",\"CTRM\",\"management\",\"Regulations\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Blog\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\",\"name\":\"Dislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dislocations and Adaptions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/\",\"name\":\"Commodity Technology Advisory\",\"description\":\"CTRM Market Insights\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Commodity Technology Advisory\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.png\",\"width\":700,\"height\":700,\"caption\":\"Commodity Technology Advisory\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommodityTechnologyAdvisory\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/comtechadvisory\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/2980731\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/Comtechadvisory\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7bbe28e59e09a076a043cc6838fcedb4\",\"name\":\"Gary Vasey\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/author\/garymvasey\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory","description":"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory","og_description":"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/","og_site_name":"Commodity Technology Advisory","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommodityTechnologyAdvisory","article_published_time":"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":700,"url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gary Vasey","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@comtechadvisory","twitter_site":"@comtechadvisory","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gary Vasey","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/"},"author":{"name":"Gary Vasey","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7bbe28e59e09a076a043cc6838fcedb4"},"headline":"Dislocations and Adaptions","datePublished":"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/"},"wordCount":212,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization"},"keywords":["build","CTRM","management","Regulations"],"articleSection":["Blog"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/","name":"Dislocations and Adaptions | Commodity Technology Advisory","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-17T12:16:31+00:00","description":"In our book and many different papers over the years, Patrick and I have talked about the evolution of C\/ETRM software in terms of technology adoption curves and market dislocations. Some of you might be familiar with out model? The general idea is that the technology adoption curve for E\/CTRM software keeps on getting ‘dislocated’ by sudden changes in the industry – Enron, Regulations, deregulation of markets, and so on.       The impact of these market dislocations is to stall the natural growth of the adoption curve creating a set of stranded products from smaller vendor who cannot afford to adapt while creating a new and larger market\/adoption curve for an enhanced version of CTRM. Some products and vendors survive and transition while there is an opportunity for new entrants in the form of start ups and opportunists from nearby markets – banking, risk management, treasury etc.   The model helps to explain why there remain over 100 vendors in the market despite many being very small, highly focused and regional in nature. It helps explain why the top 2-3 vendors haven’t yet saturated the market and why build is more often a solution than one might imagine Continue reading Dislocations and Adaptions. This article appeared first on CTRM Center.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/blog\/dislocations-and-adaptions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dislocations and Adaptions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/","name":"Commodity Technology Advisory","description":"CTRM Market Insights","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#organization","name":"Commodity Technology Advisory","url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/06\/social-square-logo.png","width":700,"height":700,"caption":"Commodity Technology Advisory"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CommodityTechnologyAdvisory","https:\/\/twitter.com\/comtechadvisory","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/2980731","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/Comtechadvisory"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/#\/schema\/person\/7bbe28e59e09a076a043cc6838fcedb4","name":"Gary Vasey","url":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/author\/garymvasey\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4565"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.comtechadvisory.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}